In Election Debate In America Ignored China: The Forgotten Geopolitical Challenge. With the U.S. preparing for its next election, there are several different issues currently under discussion across the nation – from the economy and healthcare to immigration and climate change. Yet a key subject is noticeably absent: China. Although America is on the verge of an election debate, China has done little in the way of a debate about its position in the global order given that it is arguably one of America’s largest geopolitical and economic adversaries. This is all the more surprising given how wide-ranging those relations can be, from trade and technology to national security and global diplomacy.
This piece examines why China has fallen out of the American election debate, what this significant gap means for U.S. foreign policy, and where the country stands as a world leader in the future.
Why U.S.-China Relations Are So Important
Today, few bilateral relationships in the world are as important as that between the United States and China. In recent years, China has emerged as a powerful economic competitor to America, and its military power and technological prowess threaten the facade of US hegemony. These two nations are intertwined in a tangled web of cooperation and competition that shapes global supply chains, international trade policies, environmental agreements, and military alliances.
Frictions have grown in the past several years over Chinese tariffs, alleged theft of American technology, human rights violations in China, and Beijing’s moves to expand territorial control across the South China Sea. Although these problems need addressing, American political candidates have by and large shied away from naming China as a campaign issue. It’s questions over whether China’s influence and challenges are getting the scrutiny they deserve.
Where is China in the debate?
There are several reasons why China is so conspicuously missing from America’s election discussion.
- Economic Reports in the U.K. Most Likely Ignored domestic Front Stays in the driving seat
Even as it contends with issues such as inflation, the continuing impact of the coronavirus pandemic and immigration reform, and access to health care, political candidates are concentrating on anti-voter-fraud laws, guns, and other hot buttons that go straight to American voters. During election cycles, domestic issues tend to predominate questions in voters’ minds, particularly when they feel economically squeezed.
Ashcroft users found voters to be far more preoccupied with the cost of living, healthcare, and their economic prospects than they were with international affairs. The issues playing closest to the voters seem to be on a small scale compared to things one might normally think of as in the realm of Foreign Policy A, yet are always close enough that candidate (and donor!) messages have been attuned accordingly: Complex foreign policy has been tertiary due Crises X, Y and Z requiring triage thereby pushing secondary concerns like CHINA COLLUSION down into the Evangelical Coltan Supply political subconscious).
- Polarization of U.S. Politics
The seemingly eternal chasms in American politics make it increasingly difficult to talk about the type of issues that require both parties’ leadership — like, say, foreign policy. Washington is more divided than ever along strict red-blue lines, with both camps prioritizing the politics of domestic point-scoring at the expense of foreign policy.
The weight of China in US foreign policy is an intricate and complex world politics resume that will not reflect the swamp on Capitol Hill, highly partisan as well.
- Economic Interdependence
But despite the rising tensions, the U.S. and China are still deeply economically interdependent. As well as being a huge market and crucial trade partner, American businesses also employ many Chinese people both in China itself and through their supply chain. The political impact of a more assertive confrontation with China could be too risky for any politician to tout during an election debate cycle.
In addition, the economic fallout of a debate over the system could raise concerns about job losses and cost increases among voters, which may not make it an irresistible subject for candidates eager to win votes.
- Change in Foreign Policy Focus
The last ten years have seen a change in the position of the U.S. regarding foreign policy which has shifted to non-state actors and regions that are outside of the traditional great power rivalries. China, meanwhile, has largely gone missing from our election discourse…outside of assurances that it is getting more distant just as everything explodes in the Ukraine and the Middle East.
Still, perhaps not one of the relationships America and China stage is more significant than another. How they handle this rivalry will shape the next decade or possibly the course of global stability, technology, and trade.
What does it mean to evade the China debate?
In Election Debate In America Ignored China: The Forgotten Geopolitical Challenge. Snoring China in the ongoing presidential debate may have far-reaching repercussions for American foreign policy and world leadership.
- This is a failure to seize an opportunity for public awareness.
The American voting public needs to know how the rise of China affects their daily lives, from what they buy to where they work. Political candidates are doing themselves a disservice by not discussing China because talking about the complexities of global trade and national security would be a golden opportunity to inform their constituents about where things are headed especially in this age of technological innovation.
- Unclear Policy Directions
Blind Vetting: With no vigorous China discussion, voters have no more information on what each candidate would do about U.S.-China relations. The lack of clarity (if not dishonesty) of either contender about trade policies, defense strategies, and human rights positions does very little to help voters determine which candidate is best suited to confront one of the paramount global challenges of the 21st century.
- Coming Geopolitical Unrest
The sway of China has reached far beyond trade and economics. Its military presence in the South China Sea has grown, it dominates global supply chains of essential goods and it has spread its diplomacy far through initiatives like Belt and Road. Failing to address China in their national debate over the next U.S. president may leave America underprepared for future geopolitical shifts against a deteriorating scenario one that has implications for America’s power to shape events worldwide hereafter; even if we elect another Hillary, or perhaps not at all (a potential interpretation).
How Big Is The China Debate?
In this contemporary world, Home and foreign matters do not spread apart things. The ascendancy of China changes the economic, technological, and national security landscape for America. An in-depth election debate over China would bring out essential concerns including;
Her policy positions included the following: Trade policies How will the U.S. reduce trade deficits and protect intellectual property?
Competing with China in technology: Will the US remain a dominant player and world leader in 5G, AI, and quantum computing or not?
National security 2: How will we protect ourselves against China, its militarization, and cyber crimes on our own?
Human rights: How will the U.S. approach human rights abuses in Xinjiang, and concerning Hong Kong?
In Election Debate In America Ignored China: The Forgotten Geopolitical Challenge. With voters headed to the polls, the U.S.-China relationship must be examined as a crucial determinant of what comes next in America — at home and abroad. For breaking news and live news updates, with Newspoint48’s news blog.
